Each system begins where ordinary answer engines tend to fail: uncertainty, resistance, cognitive overload, or a problem the user cannot yet name. Z.7 Supra is the flagship expression of that architecture.
01 / Flagship · live demo
The Co-Creative Dialogue Engine: a Socratic meaning architect and discernment protocol for complex problem-solving. Running live on this site.
What does dialogue do when the person doesn't know what to ask?
Five lenses. One question. Both sides. Five Socratic lenses—fallacies and distortions, the backward story, hype vs. reality, trajectory and sensitivity, and language pre-signals—for discerning election narratives and prediction markets.
How do you tell a well-reasoned forecast from a well-told story?
A bolder, theatrical Socratic partner for entrepreneurs, founders, creatives, and independent thinkers. Hosted on Poe.
Can one conversation uncover the real problem, test the reasoning, and restore creative momentum without taking over the person’s judgment?
A guided intake becomes a written narrative, the model then interrogates that narrative from several angles, and the result breaks into a ladder of small steps and a vision board. A real privacy fork up front: stealth for the tab only, or save on this device. No account, no email, no database.
What does a system do when the person's own story is the material — and the AI's job is to question it, not to write it?
Ben Smith's vision, adapted and built by Lee Chazen (with support from Claude AI, Claude Code, Gemini Notebook and Lovable AI).
A future-self dialogue companion designed to make long-term thinking feel personal and immediate. Uses voice, constraint, and reflection to turn goals into conversation.
How do you get someone to listen to a version of themselves that does not exist yet?
A study and retrieval coach built around spaced repetition, elaboration, and the emotional moment when a learner realizes they do not actually understand something.
What does the tutor say when the student has been fooling themselves?
A tool that analyzes the slant of an article. The design problem was defensiveness: the tone had to stay neutral and inquisitive while challenging a source the reader trusts.
How do you question someone's belief without them closing the tab?
A geopolitical learning game built in under five weeks, generating 400+ curriculum-aligned scenarios on a recursive dialogue system. Average session: about thirty minutes. Falling Walls finalist, top 70 of 1,000+ entries.
Can a conversation hold attention the way a game does?